The Center for Legal and Court Technology is an entrepreneurial public service initiative of the Marshall-Wythe Law School at the College of William & Mary and the National Center for State Courts, dedicated to advancing the efficient use of technology in the administration of justice. We are actively engaged in worldwide consulting on the design and implementation of appropriate technology in courtrooms, providing cutting-edge training on the latest advancements in legal technology, keeping the public informed as to news and developments in the area of legal technology, publishing whitepapers, conducting research trials, and giving back to the community through fellowships and community service initiatives like our Fairytale Trials for K-12 students.

CLCT at Work Consulting
CLCT at Work Research
Courses and Training
Community Outreach
Latest CLCT Updates
10th Conference on Privacy and Public Access to Court Records

The National Center for State Courts and Center for Legal and Court Technology are hosting the 10th Conference on Privacy and Public Access to Court Records. The conference is October 12-13, 2015.  Click here to find out more!

Latest Video

Find out how the technology at the court reporter station in the McGlothin Courtroom, the world’s most technologically advanced courtroom, works!

Recent Posts

A Forfeiture of Rights: For-Life Ankle Monitoring Upheld by the 7th Circuit

Is legal punishment meant to deter future bad behaviors, punish the bad actor, or rehabilitate the bad actor?  Every law student in his or her first week of law school is posed that question, although it seems that no law professor can give a straight answer.  In an interesting, and maybe even surprising, decision, the 7th muddied the waters even further.


In Belleau v. Wall, Michael Belleau challenged the constitutionality of his Wisconsin sentence requiring him as a civilly committed sex-offender to wear an ankle monitoring device after his release in addition to registering as a sex-offender.  The federal district court ruled that this was an invasion of Belleau’s privacy.  Wisconsin appealed that decision to the 7th Circuit.  The 7th Circuit overruled the district court’s decision holding that the burden on privacy is balanced against the gain to society as the test for such a monitoring program to stand.  The Court reasoned that Belleau’s own actions had already severely curtailed” his privacy; thus, the requirement of the ankle monitor was not unduly burdensome.


For more information, click here.

  1. LegalTech New York 2015—An Exhibition of the Latest in Legal Technology Leave a reply
  2. California Lawmaker Proposes Warrant Requirement for Digital Data Access Leave a reply
  3. 2014 E-Discovery Year in Review Leave a reply
  4. The Internet of Things and Its Impact on Legal Proceedings Leave a reply
  5. The Implications of the “Uberization” of Legal Services Leave a reply
  6. McGlothlin Courtroom in Classroom Mode Leave a reply
  7. DC Circuit Court of Appeals Hears Challenge to NSA’s Metadata Collection Program Leave a reply
  8. Public Disclosure Requests Threaten to Shut Down Plan to Equip Seattle Police with Body Cameras Leave a reply
  9. Stricter Requirements on “Stingray” Use by Police Leave a reply